Lets look at the benefits and drawbacks of rental and builtin webhard
Let's consider the pros and cons of rental and built-in webhard.
Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This identifies something that shares idc's server resources with other users.
Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.
The rental type gets the advantage of having a server on idc, so it does not have to be managed separately, and the original setting cost is low.
However, you must pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.
There are disadvantages such as dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains.
Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to build services, freeing up capacity and traffic.
It has the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies usually do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not only a Webhard, it's a company.
It is because it really is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.
Link hard solutions have emerged based on the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without the burden.
It does not have to purchase H/W separately, and the solution alone allows users to build Webhard by utilizing the required pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had a website or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.
OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.
By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the company's homepage in addition to the Webhard's original function, the idea of developing a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the answer.
The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, which is often fully built in Soho, therefore the parts which have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot.
It is now essential for Soho to determine a web hard system.
Rental vs. Construction.
Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Internet service that allows you to download files on the internet at a fixed monthly cost. This means that the usage of web hard has become common.
But it's not just lately that this concept came out, and it's true that it is been a long time. The moment it came out, many people used it, and there have been many workers in offices who didn't sign up for it or even covered their personal expenses because of lack of capacity, and there are probably still some now.
The biggest background of the phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are many burdens and inconveniences to pay monthly expenses based on limited capacity. p2p 추천 In addition, the service is provided against the backdrop of a big portal, which also leads to security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which is why the company won't adopt it.
In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server includes a server (HW)+ operating-system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses in line with the number of users), that is prohibitive compared to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.
NAS supplies a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly reduce the needs of the webhard users. Webhard is very innovative because it supports uploading files automagically. It's a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. could be accessed from the outside without needing to buy an authorized IP.
Unfortunately, there are functional limitations as the basic webhard included in these NAS is basic. As the word "basic" implies, it isn't a webhard solution developed at a higher cost. Due to this fact, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Needless to say, it is a paid option, but it's a very low-cost, very helpful solution that's less than a tenth of the expense of building a single server.
Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low priced, creating a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll check out the rough features of Webhard and guide you. It is possible to go over it and choose the best one according to the reality and needs.
