This short article is modified from the post of Fantastic God lixihong10 in Kafan Forum

From Pediascape
Jump to: navigation, search

The article is as follows (slightly deleted):
A few days ago, my friend accidentally deleted the 40G file (the file is also substantial without having going by way of the recycle bin), so I asked for assistance. At that time, quite a few softwares were distributed in the past, but the content of recovery was different, so I had the idea of ​​data recovery computer software beneath a simple evaluation.
Take part in testing software:
Super Information Recovery Software_v2.7.1.5
Kingsoft Information Recovery_v2.0
EaseUSData_v11.eight (effortless data recovery)
EasyRecovery12 [Single File]
This data recovery test environment is: Server2016, test FAT32 delete; FAT32 format; NTFS delete; NTFS format.
go more is 512 MB. Following every single test, use winhex to fill the data with 00.
NTFS formatted recovery test final results The following figure could be the collated information, and the text provides the original table file download.
▲ All test information (click to enlarge) NTFS will be the highlight. The earlier three test benefits are not a great deal distinctive (so Xiao Jiao omitted here). After NTFS formatting and recovery, the difference steadily widened.
Super data recovery computer software _v2.7.1.five:
Unexpectedly, the earlier tests are certainly not undesirable, NTFS formatting truly BMP, PDF, PNG is entirely lost. Soft folder two software program five folders only restore two folders, the other can be a sub-folder (the sort of mess)
Kingsoft Data Recovery_v2.0:
87% of files recovered by soft are far better than super data recovery computer software, however the earlier four formats are all linked. The project nonetheless loses empty folders.
Added scanning is very powerful, specifically photos and documents are fundamentally not lost. The two exes in the soft directory have been also located, however the name was changed (the only a single that restored two exe files)
Compared together with the above, the PDF has a poor MD5 file, the project lost the empty folder, EXE only discovered one particular, plus the name can also be necessary.
Similar to Jinshan recovery effect.
6 PDFs and 4 MD5s are poor, but the content is not lost, all the things else is ok.
Prior to this software performs effectively, but the further recovery effect inside the NTFS format is actually a bit poor, especially damaged photographs, and two PDF damage.
EaseUSData_v11.eight (Ease My Data Recovery):
Two jpg photos have been lost and 5 PDF files were damaged (other application will not be damaged but only MD5 is diverse. It really is estimated that the algorithm for PDF file recovery must be checked). The earlier tests are also great, plus the result is poor NTFS.
EasyRecovery12 [single file]:
Except that the PDF file MD5 has a challenge (however the file could be opened generally), the others aren't terrible.
Professor _v2018.four.41:
The PDF file and its MD5 would be the similar. I believed it was the king, but it turned out to be bronze later.
To sum up the super data recovery software program _v2.7.1.5:
I used to like this a single, but I'll throw away the recycle bin immediately after this test (as far as I know, this software program has three vests: Anyi Information Recovery; DataExplore; SuperRecovery)!
Kingsoft Data Recovery_v2.0:
The recovery effect will be the worst amongst the ten models, and we'll see it inside the recycle bin (this application should be created by yanan company, and also the yanfr.dat and yanrs.dat inside the directory generally can not run, such as prime, universal, etc. XX are vests).
R-Studio_v8.eight.171: (advisable)
The old-fashioned information recovery software, the number seems to possess been a free remote information recovery service several years ago. At that time, the USB flash drive information was deliberately deleted to restore it. This really is the application that came out. I personally really feel the top within this test. (It's already debuted in 8.9, and also the flash version is extremely fast, however the official web site can not see the update log. 8.8 and 8.9 are per week away. Those who just like the most up-to-date version can search it within the forum. Individual package file, run and register, optimize Language).
PartitionGuruPro_v4.9.5.508: (advised)
That is an overseas version of DiskGenius, a partitioning tool that is certainly crucial (information recovery effect is also fantastic, single file, run each registered).
The well-liked Wondershare information recovery worth within the earlier section from the forum is XXX yuan, see you in the recycle bin.
Moderate level, your singing did not impress me. Sorry, your data recovery potential didn't impress me, thanks, goodbye.
ComfyPartitionRecovery_v2.eight: (advisable)
I genuinely like this computer software, and it is precisely the same as the resource manager (supporting the function of not restoring preview photographs and videos is quite good), however the formatting record can be a bit miserable. In view on the special show preview, it is nevertheless reserved (personal packaging single file, run Register, optimize language).
EaseUSData_v11.8 effortless data recovery:
It really is effortless for me to create me really like and hate. The previous three tests were so marvelous, but I fell off the chain under NTFS. Delete and leave a footprint very first, wait for the update to become tested later, and appear forward to your efficiency.
EasyRecovery12: (recommended)
It truly is also an old-fashioned software, that is agented by Martin in China. So that you can stop being harmonized, the overseas version of StellarDataRecovery12 [single file] has the same impact, as well as the StellarDataRecovery library continues to be new. I package it into a single file and register it when I run it. This application is worth collecting and adding Chinese, but I need to have to set Chinese manually.
Professor _v2018.four.41: (Suggested by Android)
Used for Android data recovery (ROOT necessary) Android necessary.
Finally, even though there is certainly website in this assessment, it can be definitely tired (for relative rigor). It took virtually two weeks of free of charge time before and following, and once the post was written, half on the information was lost.